AI Is Settling In and Power Is Moving With It

Plus: models that won’t quit, factories that don’t tweet, and leaders playing catch-up

In partnership with

Hello, Human Guide

Today, we will talk about these THREE stories:

  • Why the most valuable AI right now is the one that doesn’t get tired

  • How AI quietly moved from demos into factories

  • What it means when global leaders talk about AI like it’s already gone too far

Introducing the first AI-native CRM

Connect your email, and you’ll instantly get a CRM with enriched customer insights and a platform that grows with your business.

With AI at the core, Attio lets you:

  • Prospect and route leads with research agents

  • Get real-time insights during customer calls

  • Build powerful automations for your complex workflows

Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.

The AI That Thinks Longer Is Starting to Win

The most useful AI right now isn’t flashy, it’s patient.

Developers and researchers are increasingly spending multi-hour sessions inside a single model, using it for planning, debugging, and long-form reasoning instead of quick answers. Internal testing across long-context tasks shows performance gaps opening once prompts stretch past 80,000–120,000 tokens, where weaker models stall or drift.

What stands out is how human this feels. Real work happens slowly, late at night, cursor blinking, tabs piling up. Models that can stay coherent across that mess don’t feel smarter—they feel dependable.

The implication is simple: endurance beats brilliance. Tools that can’t think long enough won’t stay in the workflow.

If AI value comes from staying power, the real question is which products people stop closing at 2 a.m.

Factories Got AI Before Feeds Did

AI made itself useful where no one was looking.

Manufacturers are now deploying AI for visual inspection, predictive maintenance, and robotic coordination at scale, with reported productivity gains between 12.1% and 19.4% across electronics and automotive lines over the past two years. Defect rates are dropping, downtime windows are shrinking, and systems are improving quietly without rebrands.

What strikes me is how boring this looks. No avatars. No prompts. Just machines running longer with fewer mistakes. While software culture debates wording, factories are embedding models into systems that never log out.

This kind of progress compounds. Once AI is inside physical infrastructure, it’s hard to unwind.

If the biggest AI wins show up in supply chains instead of screens, the harder question is who notices before it’s locked in.

When Leaders Talk About AI, It’s Already Late

AI has become a governance problem because it already became a power problem.

At global forums, executives and policymakers now frame AI as both an economic engine and a system that moved faster than oversight. Private estimates suggest more than $1.5 trillion in AI infrastructure commitments are already locked through the end of the decade, largely outside any single regulator’s control.

What bothers me is the shift in tone. This isn’t about possibilities anymore—it’s about limits. You can feel it in early-morning panels, screens glowing, as people discuss “guardrails” after the capital is committed.

The pattern is familiar: build first, negotiate later.

When leaders admit they’re reacting instead of steering, the real question is who AI ends up serving once the decisions are live.